In the cozy living rooms of
middle class India news from Kashmir excites the people and gives them the
chance to prove themselves as the great lover of the country by saying few line
about it like ‘Dooth Mangoge to Kheer
Dange, Kashmir mangogay to cheer dange’ (we will give you anything you
want but if you want Kashmir then we will tear you), ‘Why don’t we attack Pakistan
to solve the problem of Kashmir’, ‘The people of Kashmir don’t want to be in
India and army is teaching them nice lesson’, ‘When we are giving them so
special rights like article 370 then what else they want’. ‘Those who are
helping the terrorists should be killed’ so on and so forth’. These casual comments
on Kashmir try to make the issue black and white which hints that the solution
is very easy and why not the Government of India is showing its intention to
solve the issue.
Time and again the hue and cry
for Plebiscite is asked by the people from some parts of the society
considering that it will solve their problem. There are three sections of the
people in J&K, one, who wants to remain with India, second, who want to go
with Pakistan and third, who wants them to be independent and not to be ruled
by India or Pakistan. We can sense that the majority of them don’t want to be
with Pakistan but skewness of the graph tilted toward India and Independent
Kashmir from time to time. Let us say, majority of the people want to be
Independent, what answer do we have? Before jumping in to the conclusion and
imagined-theories we first understand how this segment of the people looks
towards India.
This section of Kashmiris never
likes India, because they always have seen India with guns in CRPF jawans or in
army men. Outside they are been treated as terrorist and in Kashmir they think they have
been treated as slave. The history has created their memory the way it is and
Pakistan continued fueling the issues to create a hostile environment against
India.
Parveena Ahangar achieved
international attention in 1994 when she formed Association of Parents of
Disappeared People (APDP). On 18 August 1990, Javed Ahmad Ahangar, then a
17-year-old student, was allegedly picked up by the army for a militant. She
started an agonising search for her son. She informed the local police station
about his arrest and staged a sit-in on the road for a full day. After a six-
month search for her son, she finally approached the court which ordered an
inquiry into her missing son's case. For four years nothing substantial
happened in her case. The state government's request for sanction to prosecute
the accused Army officers was not granted by the central government. In 1994, determined
to continue her struggle, Parveena formed the Association of Parents of
Disappeared People (APDP). The APDP believes 8,000 to10,000 people are missing.
On 21 August 2011, the State Human
Rights Commission (SHRC) confirms that 2,156 unidentified bodies lay in
unmarked graves in 30 locations in north Kashmir. The SHRC had ordered the
investigation after taking cognisance of a December 2009 report on mass graves
titled “Buried Evidence” by the International People's Tribunal on Human Rights
and Justice in Kashmir (IPTK).
Now there are two versions of
truths; one version says that these are the bodies of militants who were killed
by armed forced and another version says that these bodies are from 10,000
missing people.
The incident that further
strengthened the memory of this section of the people is Kunan Poshspora incident occurred on
February 23, 1991. An army unit launched a search and interrogation operation
in Kunan Poshspora, Kupwara district and 53 women were allegedly gang raped by
soldiers that night. Villagers claimed that a police investigation never took
place in the region. Wajahat Habibullah, former DC, asked why not the incident
was first reported and answer was not easy. Some women don’t want them to be publicize
as the raped victim in the conservative society and others who wanted to come
up were not heard.
After much criticism Press
Council of India investigate the incident and medical examination conducted on
32 women nearly one month after incident, confirmed that the women had wounds
on their chests and abdomens, and that the hymens of three of the unmarried women
had been torn. But the team claimed that that such delayed examination proved
nothing.
Once again there are two versions
of statements; one states that the charges against army were bundle of
fabricated lies and a massive hoax orchestrated by militant groups and all allegations
are grossly exaggerated or invented. Another version, from Asia Watch, in its
1991 stated, ‘The alacrity with which military and government authorities in
Kashmir discredited the allegations of rape and their failure to follow through
with procedures that would provide critical evidence for any prosecution’.
The plight of soldier fighting in
the Kashmir valley is not less critical than the people of Kashmir. If he is
asked to kill the enemy in battlefield, he doesn’t have to give the second
thought but to shoot. But if he is landed in the place where he is surrounded
by his own people but some of them can be his enemy whom he has to kill to save
him and his country. Thousands of the solders have given their lives in the
valley. Nearly 4,000 soldiers have been
killed in the country after the Kargil operations in 1999 while more than 390
Army troops have committed suicide in the last three years, Lok Sabha was
informed on 25 November 2012.
Minority
hindu and majority muslims believed and created ‘Kashmiriyat’ in the long past was
ruined by the crackdown in 1990’s, when a number of forces started playing
together; ISI’s role in Kashmir, Political right of Kashmiris, Mujahideen
Influence, religion and human rights violation by militants and by armed
forces. The people in Kashmir, whether participated with any force or not,
remain the only victim.
No comments:
Post a Comment